在西方为什么不能请律师?

字体 -

在西方,中国人的思维跟当地人不同引起很多误会和麻烦。一般政府是惹不起,躲得起的。

例如,一旦发生什么事,家庭和朋友之间,生意之间要报警会把内部矛盾激化,转变为敌我矛盾,引火烧身,后果不堪设想

报警是邀请警察进入你们的地盘,放弃你们的权力和隐私,主动给警察带来极大地机会,因为有生意,所以,警察当然特别积极主动。他们应该感谢你,而你们还特别感激感谢他们。

一旦报了警,其实,大家都会手忙脚乱,害怕,会不惜一切代价请律师是可以理解的,但是是错误的。

我因证券会的错误和误导入狱,我在监狱里接触很多人,做过仔细的调查和研究,这里的办法是很多事不请律师,一旦请律师表示你接受并同意你的家庭问题,普通问题就进入商业状态,愿意受制于商业法,愿意接受商业法律欺诈,你将受制于律师和律师协会,律师会把问题有意无意之中越搞越复杂,时间越搞长,费用越搞越高,其实很多事是不能请律师的,自己跟法官说明白,摆事实讲道理,简单明了,既没有经济负担和压力,也自由。没有律师他们拖不起,有律师,你拖不起。

解决的办法最好是能让起诉一方,为了大家共同的利益撤诉并上庭帮你说话和帮自己说话,一般情况法官是通情达理的,认错不认罪,或者认罪也没有关系,很多事不是见不得人的事,找个好法官,跟法官讨价还价,你对法官说我这是家庭纠纷,内部矛盾不是犯罪,不要有犯罪记录,法官大人判的太重等等。合情合理合法。

大家是否注意到这里的法官定案需要你的同意,双方同意才能最后决定,所以,你可以要个好的条件。法官判的,法官要的你不同意,法庭就拖,迫使你或者威胁,骗你你同意,这里的法官有时也会不择手段,会骗你同意。

加拿大没有原告就没有被告,起诉一方坚决果断撤诉,法官就会放人。

有律师就不一样,复杂得多。没有律师,你赢不了,但有律师你会输的更惨。没有律师,法官不敢欺负你,有公众保护,有律师你会被捆着你的手脚,法官可以任意打骂欺负你。

没有律师就没有这样那样的限制,没有经济压力,即使判罪也要轻得多。你没有赢不了,有律师你一定输,并且输得非常惨,这里的监控官跟你的辩护律师实质上是一起的,他们是合伙生意,利益是一致的,谁输谁赢是内定的,商量好的。

在西方只有1% 的律师真正能帮你,那是要钱才能砸出来的,律师只能请最有名名望,地位,有经验,能力和关系的,大多数律师一定会使你输的更惨。

我因证券会的错误和误导入狱,跟很多律师打过交道,为了找(其实是等)一个好一点的法官在狱中多等了一个月。在里面我做了很多调查研究工作,没有耽误,希望能为同胞们尽一份力量,自己吃了苦,让别人少吃苦,始终是我的愿望。

我已经让证券会和警察也长见识,我要达到一个目的就是让整全会和警察知道华人不好欺,不可欺

我没有律师,我可以给法官下面这样写信,有律师决不会这样做

NOTICE OF CONFLICT OF INTERESTAND DISHONOUR Re: THE HON. JUSTICE RICK LIBMANAnd ALL SWORN TO THE CROWN OFFICERS/AGENTS February two-eight, two-zero, one-one Comes the Sovereign living, breathing, flesh and blood man ::weizhen::tang:: ,the only Authorized Representative for WEIZHEN TANG; 

Since last year, when I first met in open court, and now, after several days of preliminary inquiry as per your order of a ban on media, I have grown to feel that a fair trial is questionable and impossible for someone like me, a hard-working and honest flesh and blood man of “Chinese-Canadian” appearance mainly due to a blatant conflict of interest.  I often feel that I am railroaded, and that intimidation is all that awaits me since this seems to be the modus operandi of this de facto “legal system”.  I look for justice and honour in our de facto government and its leaders, but I see so little. I should also mention, that according to the Bills of Exchange Act of Canada, I am obligated to lawfully bill you for that order and any and all subsequent orders you feel you need to make. The order for the ban on publicity is tendered at $1,000,000.00 Cdn fiat dollars (one million) where payment is now due or if you would like to rescind that order I can waive my bill henceforth and forthwith. Furthermore, any previous orders will be billed at the rate or cost of that order to me.

       The first time I encountered you, Justice Libman, I initially found you to be kind and patient, and I sensed that we were communicating on a high level.  I was told by many others that I was “lucky to get a good judge like the Honourable Justice Libman!”  I finally felt that there was hope for me to receive a fair and speedy trial on these alleged strange charges against me but alas, the awareness recently that all Crown Officers work for the same team and have sworn an oath to uphold your own society, namely the Law Society, no fair trial can ever be possible due to this conflict of interest you all are party to.

       With this in mind, I am not surprised at all that I have not had any good communication with government agencies,  as I felt strongly that I had been wrongly charged and denied justice by the Ontario Securities Commission, and later, by the police, again, Crown Officers.  After all, I often lacked a lawyer to work on my behalf but then that would have been a disadvantage to me because had I become a “client” I would fall under a different category and become a “ward of the state” and “incapable of handling my own affairs” if Black’s Law or Bouviers’ Dictionaries are any indication. Then, in the middle of the week of February 14, I found you, Justice Libman, condescending toward me, and even rude, which is dishonourable, which at first surprised, and then, disappointed me.  Others saw your behaviour as well, and later told me that they were “surprised that a good judge would act that way” towards me.  “How can you ever expect a fair trial?” I was asked. It is my own seeking of absolute honour that I searched for what would be a reasonable answer and I soon discovered the truth of what is really going on in the Commerce courts of CANADA, the Crown Corporation which are not the Law of the Land but rather the Law of the High Seas, a.k.a. Commerce /Admiralty or Maritime law.

      

Here I am, lacking a lawyer, and I felt taken advantage of since I am not fluent in your court room language of “Legalese” which is a version of English but certainly not the English I know in common usage beyond your doors of “business”.   I found your words and actions unreasonable and most certainly, dishonourable, and I again, lost faith in a justice system that I have long revered and respected.  My investors, going back over 15 years, had long believed in me and were satisfied, even thrilled, by the excellent returns which I was able to achieve from their investments which they had entrusted to me.  I consistently made money for my clients for more than a dozen years:  for men and women who, like me, paid taxes on their superior gains and helped to strengthen the Ontario and Canadian economies, which I have also recently discovered, is a deception based on an un-revealed, forced joinder which furthers the entire systems’ dishonourable activity. 

                               I had become known in my community and beyond as “The Chinese Warren Buffett,” and only a tiny handful of my clients turned against me, when some of my investments soured during the recent “Great Recession.”  (Indeed, how many other investors/investment companies did well over 2008, or lost less than half of their net worth?)  In fact, it is informative that nearly four dozen of my clients, who had lost large sums of money, actually signed a letter which they had created themselves, begging the O.S.C. to allow me to continue trading on their behalf! Can you imagine that even a single victim of that truly evil Ponzi schemer, the American Bernard Madoff, would have asked that despicable man to continue to handle their money, once his deliberate fraud had been uncovered? 

                                          There was no fraud on my part; no Ponzi scheme nor any intention to enter such a dishonourable status.  I did not even know the meaning of the word, much less how to run one. I would raise into question the largest Ponzi scheme of all at this point, the actual creation of what we refer to as “money” and how it is brought into existence. The system is collapsing due to not enough loans etc. being created to further the banks’ deception upon the masses since it is their wet, ink signatures that are required to create “money” in the first place. Quite simply, that’s how bankruptcy works where only signatures are used for a promise to pay in the future.

       Interestingly, I recently had a voluntary lawyer, who suggested that there be a media ban on reports of my situation, to protect me from unfair attacks from a few of my investors, and even from the unfair declarations of the Crown. Therefore, I would like that the media ban be lifted, so both investors, and the public at large, can see and protect the innocent and to better see how innocent I am of the ugly charges against me. I do not fear the truth sir; in fact, there is much truth that can be revealed through large scale publicity of this particular “case” but then, I’m sure you’re already aware of that.

The O.S.C. has wrongly charged me with the hideous crime of a running a Ponzi scheme. ( If I had attempted one, where is the money I would have made?  Why then is my house now mortgaged heavily, and I am essentially bankrupt?) My name has been smeared, defamed, libelled and my reputation has been unjustly brought into question. I was even jailed upon returning from visiting my daughter in China—there had been no ban against me traveling out of Canada—and I spent three horrible months in the Don Jail in downtown Toronto—when I had no intention of breaking the non-trade order which had been placed against me.  Whose savings was I threatening?  Whose livelihood was I harming?  Who was being protected by my being thrown unlawfully into prison?

                                                                 Canada, the land mass, is a beautiful country; a country of Common laws and, once upon a time, justice. Its’ injustices of the past—the outrageous head taxes on the Chinese, the dreadful imprisonment of Japanese Canadians during World War II, the ugly refusal to take in hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Europe during that same period, dooming most of them to death at the hands of the Nazis—might appear to be gone but recent news in the media is exposing further Crimes Against Humanity as a result of the Genocide of this lands’ Indigenous People’s.

These are all the questions that vast numbers of people are asking to-day and I feel that I am but one more honourable man that must be steam-rolled to allow this corrupt system to maintain the status quo.

        I also feel betrayed by the actions of the O.S.C. and the police.  I could have the best lawyers in the country working on my behalf to defend me from these unwarranted charges, if only I were free to work, trade, and make a living once more but I now realize that no living, flesh and blood man could ever get a fair and honourable hearing/trial based on the corporate fiction way your courts are set up. Even alleged defence lawyers work for the same Crown that you do. How can any reasonable man expect fairness and justice in such a corrupt system as this?

Yes, all sovereign men and women are better off to take care of our own matters and flesh and blood sovereign men and women have no business in your courts. It’s much akin to a judge or a justice looking over a room full of tombstones with NAMES in ALL CAPS written on them. I assure you sir, I am a living spiritual soul and honour is maintained in the highest degree and I am certainly not a fictional tombstone. This is a very normal unilateral mistake made by those unaware of the true status of “persons/fictitious corporations” and the reason why I bring this to the light of day so that these kinds of mistakes are not due to incompetence on anyone’s part.

       I, ::weizhen::tang::, a flesh and blood, living and breathing spiritual being, and one who has made many hundreds of people wealthy through my investment skills, am innocent of all alleged “charges” against me. To plead “not guilty” would create joinder sir and you know that. I therefore proclaim my innocence. Equality is paramount and MANDATORY before the law and this has to be observed lest you go deeper into dishonour. I am showing you forgiveness in law with an opportunity to cure this matter honourably and further terms can be discussed where a mutual, meeting of the minds can offer you remedy. It is hereby also Demanded that my stolen property be returned immediately and any further Trespass on my Estate Cease and Desist by all involved parties.

A few sections of the De Facto Criminal Code of Canada, of which ALL Crown employees are bound by to keep in mind, are as follows and which include but are not limited to;

Sections 337, 336, 122, 380, 131, 139, 137, 334, 15, 21, with section 15 being of particular concern on the part of the Crown in relation to me, a flesh and blood man. I am a De Jure Sovereign man and a living, breathing soul, not the fictitious entity Corporate all caps name that you need me to agree to be in order to contract corporation to corporation under false and fraudulent pretences. The only similarity that I may have with your concept of that which I am known by or exists is in the sound only, not the spelling. Any continuation of this ploy only serves to further dishonour you and all Crown Officers.

Govern yourselves accordingly.

Sincerely yours, by ::weizhen::tang::,                               sovereign flesh and blood man                             The only Authorized Representative in Fact for                             WEIZHAN TANG                                                                                                  UNDER RESERVE AND WITHOUT RECOURSE                               by:                                           Date: 

分享博文至:

    目前没有评论

发表评论