Court evidences are very tricky, misleading and deceptive i

字体 -

Court evidences are very tricky, misleading and deceptive in my personal experience

Most of the honourable justice does not know what they want in the court and doe not know what are evidences for the case in my experience, but the honourable makes people believe they are using evidences against you in court. The honourable justice does not always use evidences people believed to be true and evidence, I found all of them use manufactured evidence or processed evidences and ignore real evidences, I am not only surprised, but also confused.

In the case of mine, the Ponzi scheme is falsified by OSC and its staff’ false sworn evidences and manufactory. The definition of crime and definition of Ponzi scheme have changed and simplified by OSC and courts.

When my investors and I try to provide evidences to the court and the honourable, the honourable seems lying in the court that there is no evidence, no reliable evidence, not enough evidence as excuses at all the times.

All evidences are government lawyers commissioned affidavit, court paper documents and honorable justice orders, most of times, the court orders even are not justice’s orders, the honourable take orders from the lawyers of government and signed by the justice, it is appear to be conflicting interest and dishonor, they totally ignore and forget investors, or majority investors and their interest. I am the only one who always put investors’ interest first.

The way the lawyers and honourable justice make evidences are the words familiar to you and the public that” you have the right to be silent, anything you say will be used (manufactured or falsified) as evidence against you. They will mis-interpret what you say and what you mean to mislead or help the justice find case or make the case against you.

The crown attorney, Lawyers on the other side always falsified your word or mine as true evidences, there is no motivation and real evidences in my case, only tens thousands of court documents and procedures and years’ processes. There is no communication, no dialogue, no exchange of evidences, no talk, no understanding and intention to understand each other, no honesty, no sincerity and no honor, no brain and no theory and no solution, no aim and no open motivation, but plenty of damages, harm and prosecution and punishment before prove.

It seems the longer, the more punishment and damage, the happier, the crown office attorney and OSC attorney and its staff feel. They seems try to make money for the government, but waste huge money and effort for nothing and mislead the government and the public. They are in the business of making money, dreams of hundred thousand of times of 500 dollar per hour, but they do not know how to make money and where to make and lose big in my case. Nobody could make money from the minus 60 million dollars except myself. I did not invite anybody to destroy himself and the government financially and its reputation.

The honorable Chinese Warren Buffett ‘s 1% weekly return is a 20 years’ effort, a dream, miracle, a theory, practice, good for investors, economy and the government, why do give us all a chance?

HONOR & DISHONOR

This is the most important aspect of the law. In law, “Honor” or “Dishonor” is a process. It is what is done in response to a presentment. Throughout the entire process you must be in honor. This applies to everything you do in the legal process. To act with dishonor toward the other person is the highest sin in any system of law.

分享博文至:

    2 条评论

  1. 1. 申克飞 - 2012年7月6日 16:09

    法律从来是不公正的。如果你认为好律师能帮你赢官司,坏律师能帮你输官司的。

    如果律师起到这样大的作用,那么就说明了法律是虚伪的。因为同样的事实,法庭只能有一个唯一的判决。如此律师能起到这么大的作用,就说明了法律本身是不完备的,内部充满了不一致,而事实只是律师进行认证的工具,而最后的结果天差地别。。。所以,你如果以数学的想法,就是只有根据事实,法律只有唯一正确的判决的想法是天真的。

    加拿大这么多的法律条文,他们都是独立的,不是靠逻辑继承出来的,这么可能会一致呢。。。具有一致性的,只有数学和物理,他们只基于几条公理演绎出一个学科,其中的不一致性经历了人类最优秀大脑的百年质疑。但律师是什么人,背了一堆条文,在几乎确定的谜失中勉强地寻求只对自己有利的条文,然后鼓动他的舌头。。。。法律只是一门管理艺术,绝对谈不上半点科学和哲理。

  2. 2. 申克飞 - 2012年7月6日 16:19

    但是人的良心和道德很重要,因为这反映了人的本性。

    中国的哲学家深知这个,所以中国的几千年历史中,法家至上的朝代没有几轮。

    统治的是儒家,他们认为人性本善。所以相对地重德轻法。

    重德的,重视的是人的普通美好人性。重法的,重视的是统治阶级的根本利益(无论说得多么的好听)。

发表评论